I’ve been a
copy editor most of my working life, at book publishers, the Village Voice, and
Publishers Weekly, and for many years teaching copy editing at NYU’s journalism
program. When I first started teaching I had come across an editorial in the New York Times on the topic of “like” vs. “such as.”
Older
readers may remember a TV ad for Winston cigarettes featuring the line, “Winston
tastes good, like a cigarette should.” This is generally considered
ungrammatical (“like” should be “as” in this case), and the ad was widely
ridiculed at the time. But a side effect was to make some writers leery of
using “like” in any comparative form at all. And some grammarians encouraged
them in their fear. The result was the proliferation of “such as” in such
sentences as “The reading list for Freshman English included classics such as Moby
Dick, The Scarlet Letter, and The Red Badge of Courage.”
Maybe this
reads okay to you, but that “such as” is clunky to me. It could be split: “...such
classics as...” Or it could be replaced by one word, “like.”
Where
I am free-lance copy editing now, there is a proliferation of “such as.” It’s
as though all the editors at this magazine were taught by English teachers who’d
been spooked. So today, I went to the basement, where I have all my teaching
files, and found the clipping of the 1985 New York Times editorial on the subject. I e-mailed the
top editors at the magazine I free-lance for and made my pitch to change some
of those “such as”s to “like.” I await their verdict.
-------------------------------------
It’s
Slice of Life Tuesday over at Two
Writing Teachers. Check out this encouraging and
enthusiastic writing community and their slices of life every Tuesday. And add
one of your own.
I'm waiting with you. Very curious to see what they say!
ReplyDelete