The
suggestions also include stocking up on disposable surgical masks. Now, I have
heard multiple health officials on the radio say NOT to do this because they
should be reserved for medical and health personnel who will be in contact with
sick people. If “civilians” buy up these masks, they won’t be available to
those who really need them.
The New England
Journal of Medicine says that the death rate from this coronavirus is somewhere
between 1.4% and 1%, while for the flu it’s about a tenth of that. It is pretty
low, but more dangerous for older people and those with other health problems,
like heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. Somehow, this list of 11 “suggestions”
in bold-face type feels less helpful to me. Am I being too sanguine?
-------------------------------------
I’m
participating in the 13th annual Slice of Life Challenge over at Two
Writing Teachers. This is day 1 of the 31-day
challenge. It’s not too late to make space for daily writing in a
community that is encouraging, enthusiastic, and eager to read what you have to
slice about. Join in!
That's very interesting, because today we got an email from the superintendent that we should not be concerned (yet) about the coronavirus in PA. It actually said that we should be more concerned about the flu. I wondered if I'm not taking all of the news seriously, because I'm not buying masks and stockpiling non-perishable goods. I think we have to find a balance between prepared and paranoid.
ReplyDeleteIt is challenging to know how to respond. I think you are just trying to be thoughtful about your next move. It seems like a good idea to be vigilant and aware while also not panicking to the point of well--panic!
ReplyDeleteEvery now and then someone says, "now is not the time for unreasoning panic," to which my late husband would always respond, "when is the right time for unreasoning panic?"
Delete